Designing Place:
 
Architecture as Community Art

in Martinsville, Indiana
 


Home

Welcome
Designing Place Curriculum
Architecture
Glossary of Terms
History of Martinsville
Morgan County History
Resources / Links


Copyright © 2006,
Morgan County Historic Preservation Society
.  All rights reserved. 
www.mchps.org

Content written by:
Joanne Raetz Stuttgen, PhD
Kathryn Maxwell

Website Designed by:
Terry Bunton

 

top• Home • Student Artwork • Objectives & Lessons • Materials & Resources • Handouts •
Lessons

Home | Day 1 & 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9, 10 & 11 | Day 12 | Day 13


Course Objectives and Overview

Author: Kathryn Maxwell
Grade Level: Art Class Grade 8

Indiana Academic Standards: Visual Art Standards 1 and 2 (History), 4 (Criticism), 5 (Aesthetics), 7, 8, 9, 10 (Production), 11 and 12 (Careers and Community), 13 (Integration)

Days One and Two: Slide Presentation and Architectural Vocabulary

8.1.1
Using the Architectural Styles handouts and viewing slides, the student will view and discuss similarities and differences in the following architectural styles: Federal, Greek and Greek Revival, Roman and Romanesque, Gothic and Gothic Revival, Italianate, Second Empire, and Queen Anne

8.1.2, 8.6.1
Students will note in the slide presentation the differences that evolved among periods in architecture.

8.1.3
Students will view illustrations of a variety of decoration in architecture that was influenced by various motifs derived from nature.

8.2.1, 8.2.2
Students will recognize that some slides will represent examples of the above architectural styles that exist in their own community.

8.2.3, 8.6.2
In class discussion, students will compare the early Western styles of architecture to the historical buildings in their community.

Day Three: Architectural Design Elements

8.3.3
Students will read the Architectural Design Elements handout and look at examples on slides or from additional classroom resource books.

 Day Four: Drawing Architectural Design Elements on the Computer

8.3.2
Using the
Architectural Design Elements handout, students will draw and label in a computer paint program examples of architectural elements.

 Day Five: Drawing Roof Styles on the Computer

8.3.2
Using the teacher’s Roof Styles handout, students will draw and label in a computer paint program examples of roof styles

Day Six: Drawing in Two-Point Perspective 

8.8.1, 8.8.2
Following the teacher’s step-by-step instruction, students will create a simple two-point perspective drawing with ruler, pencil, eraser, and paper of a gabled house with two dormers, a front door, one or two federal style windows, at least two side windows, a chimney, a front stoop, two steps, a shingled roof, and horizontal siding.

Day Seven: Architectural Drawing Quiz

8.10.2
After becoming familiar with the various architectural elements, the student will take an architectural elements quiz, correctly drawing the listed architectural elements.

Day Eight: Frank Lloyd Wright

Days Nine through Eleven: Drawing a Hometown Building

8.7.1, 8.7.2, 8.7.3
On white sulfite paper or tag board, students will draw a local building of their choice in two-point perspective using the book, Martinsville: A Pictorial History, as a resource.

8.7.2, 8.9.2, 8.10.1, 8.10.2
Students may choose to color or ink finished drawings.

8.6.1, 8.8.2, 8.9.2
The teacher will assist students in their selection of buildings based on their understanding of perspective techniques.

8.10.1
As the drawings develop; students will appreciate architecture as an art form in their hometown.

Day Twelve: Finishing Details

8.10.1, 8.11.1, 8.12.2, 8.13.1
Mount finished drawings on black construction paper. Critique each other's work. Discuss the next day's class field trip. Put artwork on display in the school or at a local business.

Day Thirteen: Architectural Scavenger Hunt Field Trip

Assessment:

  1. Teacher can evaluate each day’s class slide viewing/discussion, noting participation in the grade book.
  2. Teacher can evaluate the architectural structures quiz with handout key. Most students had 70% accuracy or above.
  3. Teacher can compare student computer paint architectural elements drawings to the handout.  Each correct drawing of an architectural adornment (element) was worth a total of 5 points. Students were evaluated on how well they handled the paint drawing program and how accurately they were able to simulate the example. Students also received one point (out of the 5 points) for correctly identifying the drawn adornment.
  4. Students can be given a vocabulary quiz in which they correctly identify fifteen architectural terms with 70% or more accuracy.  They remembered terms better when using pneumonic devices to describe the structures i.e.: “dentils” was Greek for teeth or dentures, Gothic had gruesome gargoyles, entablature sounded like a table on which one sets things, egg and dart looked like arrowheads and eggs, and Doric was “duh” simplest column.
  5. The teacher demonstrated step-by-step the drawing of a two-point perspective house. Student drawings were evaluated by comparing them to the teacher's example. Students were also evaluated on how well they used guidelines from the vanishing points and how many structural elements (i.e. windows and doors) were drawn in perspective. The drawing was worth 40 points if all the elements were completed accurately. Individual student ability was taken into consideration, as some students had learning disabilities.
  6. Final drawings were evaluated by the number of times linear perspective was used, the neatness of presentation, the accuracy of the guidelines of perspective, the creative license taken to adorn the building, the inking or coloring of the work, and the effort exerted based on the student’s cognitive and physical abilities.
  7. Class critique was open discussion. Students had to state a positive about each work. They had to name architectural elements that they saw in the drawing. They also had to identify the style that the building represented. Critique was worth 1 to 10 points depending on the depth of descriptions given.

Students generally found perspective drawing difficult but wanted to try the technique. The slide discussions were lively. They enjoyed seeing examples of fine architectural structures that were in their own hometown. It did take some time to acquire the slides of the notable structures. The digital images in this website could be used to create a PowerPoint presentation.

Top
 

Terms of Use


 

Morgan County Historic Preservation Society
P. O. Box 1377
Martinsville, IN  46151

This site was last updated 08/09/06